What would be the harm?

[Angrboda]

Well, maybe, but as noted, that issue lies on the horizon and not in the here and now. You haven't established that harm exists objectively according to the definitions you have asserted, so your QED is rather premature.

And once again you fail to engage. I have repeatedly pointed out that your conception of my argument as subjectivist is just a straw man, so, feel free to create an army of such straw men, as long as you are doing so and haven't met my actual argument, you fail.