RE: Science is inherently atheistic
December 3, 2018 at 12:32 pm
(This post was last modified: December 3, 2018 at 12:33 pm by T0 Th3 M4X.)
(December 3, 2018 at 10:53 am)Deesse23 Wrote:(December 3, 2018 at 1:08 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: You can't equally apply it to "gravity" because we know what gravity is and its impact in the natural world.We actually do not know what gravity is, although we pretty much do know how it impacts the natural world.
We do not yet know the root cause for gravity. Some people suspect a particle called "graviton", but we actually dont know.
Gravity can be defined and applied within the natural world. Its attributes are testable, repeatable, and verifiable with the same result in subsequent testing.
We know gravity is "force", and knowing the root cause is irrelevant to apply it to the natural world. It's just a subject for future study. Scientific study in regards to anything is meant to be expansive, not exclusive.
If you want to believe otherwise, then great, but I like to stick to the basics. Respectfully it's unlikely anybody is going to convince me that a vampire (that turn into bats), wolfman, or specter can be included in scientific study as subjects.
