(December 3, 2018 at 11:46 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Yeah, sure, maybe. The only way to figure that out is by you supplying me with the correct interpretation that obviates any real or perceived inconsistency.
I'm still wondering very simple things. What makes vampires somehow less credible than ghosts, or if you prefer..do you think that vampires -are- less credible than ghosts and on what basis. Additionally, how have you determined that the cause of gravity is not supernatural..and why would it matter if some cause were supernatural if it had natural effects..vampires, ghosts, or gravity....with respect to what science can and can't study?
I don't know that either ghost or vampire would be more credible. Maybe depending on how you define them. Some people believe ghosts are remnants of deceased humans, and some people believe vampires are cursed humans that feed on the blood of other humans, which has the potential to change them into another vampire. Maybe those are more probable. As far as monsters who turn into bats or specters that slime people, I doubt either is real. Maybe someone will show me otherwise. Maybe the vampire or ghost will. Until then, I don't look for them, and if the exist, hopefully they don't come looking for me.
