DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[sdelsolray]

It is not disputed, and YOU have no evidence for that lie.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_o...on_descent

Dr. Stephen C. Meyer disputes it as one scientist.

I have read and studied two of Meyer's books, Signature in the Cell and Darwin's Doubt, as well of some of his other writings.

His arguments are laced with the same logical fallacies and misrepresentations from his Discovery Institute Masters, most commonly the argument from incredulity (one of your favorites), the mere assertion (your absolute favorite), the strawman fallacy, among others, rending them ineffective and unconvincing. He does not write like a scientist. He writes like a person with a personal agenda who pretends to be a scientist. And that agenda is a religious agenda. As is typical of militant Abrahamic creationists on a salary, he complains (again, using fallacious reasoning) about established science, but only against science which conflicts with his religious beliefs. He offers no alternative, except for goddidit. He lies. He misrepresents. He conflates. He pretends to be all "sciency". He repeats previously refuted words strings (such as specified complex information) without scientific definitions or any suggestion on how to measure or test them.

He pretends to present science, which is only designed to convince gullible theists such as yourself. He succeeds, and you are a classic example.

Basically, Meyer is a disingenuous and lying whore for the Discovery Institute. And you are a gullible acolyte of this lying whore for the Discovery Institute.

Your continued reliance on his nonsense, and the nonsense from similar imposters and con men, explains much.