First order logic, set theory and God

[Bucky Ball]

You're making claims that you can't demonstrate and objections that have the same issues you're saying he has.  Even if you had valid questions, no one can automatically assume your objection invalidates his argument(s).  I've read through his claims before and some areas were a bit lacking with detail, but you couldn't discount them on that basis alone.  But that's okay because that is what peer review is for.  That's why even before you do research, you go through variables and control.  If still it is lacking, you conduct the research with better parameters.  At best you can say the research/arguments weren't optimal, but you can also go back and use it to optimize.

---

Bla bla bla bla bla
LMAO. I knew you were incapable of specifically addressing anything. You're nothing but a total fraud with bs pouring from your ass.
Since apparently you think it's good enough, (and it's all the time you're worth), I'll just reply to your bullshit in your own words :

"Those are weak arguments".