(December 10, 2018 at 9:03 pm)tackattack Wrote:(December 10, 2018 at 6:19 pm)Brian37 Wrote:
That is my point, as evidenced by the banter. I wasn't loading a question. Lets take religion out of it entirely, it'll be less galvanizing.
Why do non-smokers feel the need to dictate where smokers can and should smoke, or that business are not allowed to having smoking sections? If it doesn't affect you why should you care? It actually defeats the purpose because now smokers just stand by the front door and smoke making sure everyone gets their second-hand smoke. There is a plethora of other options for you to go to, simply choose to go somewhere else if you don't like it.
Seriously? I, the poisoned should have to go to wherever the poisoner does not poison the air? Terrible analogy.
To get more to the point of our opening post:
Religious expression in US schools by students IS allowed. In fact, it is guaranteed under our constitution. Allowing the public entity itself (the school) to spew religion is another story. For starters, which religion? Imagine the reaction of Christian parents if their children were exposed to Muslim thought. Or Hindu or Wicca or Jainism. THAT is why public institutions in the US are not allowed to weigh in on religion.
Individuals are allowed and guaranteed freedom of religion. That requires that the government must stay the hell out of it.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein