It's only destructive if they're intolerance is given any value. Then we should define tolerance as to allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one does not necessarily like or agree with) without interference. per the dictionary. If you are valuing something and rejecting it's contribution or value to a problem then that is interference, hence my ipso facto definition. If you don't like it, you're free to tell me what you think tolerance is.
I agree that everyone in society should have a buy in. I'll have to look up social conservatism for the details, but my work beckons me, more tonight.
I agree that everyone in society should have a buy in. I'll have to look up social conservatism for the details, but my work beckons me, more tonight.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
