RE: The dawn of civilization
December 15, 2018 at 10:02 pm
(This post was last modified: December 15, 2018 at 10:14 pm by Agnostico.)
Gae Bolga Wrote:You're still fielding a sprawling and ridiculous incel complaint rather than any theory on the origins of religion or civ. That's why -I- called it the chad theory, the only name it would have in academia is "Garbage".
I had to look up the definition of this term “incel”. Seems to be so many new age terms always being made.
“who define themselves as unable to find a romantic or sexual partner despite desiring one, a state they describe as inceldom”
My 15yo knew what a “chad” was but had never heard of “incel”
If u must know about my personal life. Im 41yo, married with kids.
I don’t mind to know ur personal life, why… Because I’m not bias. It makes no difference
I thought u might be logical but u fail by committing the worse logical fallacy of all in my opinion. Ad Hominem. “ur an incel therefore ur thoughts are void”. If I was an incel u would merely be attacking the man and ignoring the facts.
Human nature. One of the problems with socialism is that it fails to a knowledge human nature. Human nature is a branch of psychology. Dismissed on a fallacy.
Observations of societies in animals. Biology, ecology, society and several other branches of science. All dismissed.
Attempted look at war and its possible part in human development. Dismissed.
Thoughts which aren’t in line with his, are fallaciously dismissed
In conclusion its obvious that u harbour some very deep feelings, beliefs and prejudices. U hold ur beliefs in such high regard that u attack whoever challenges it, usually theists. In my case u found another label. The fact that its false bares little relevance.
So its only fair for me now to dismiss GaeB arguments, beliefs and even thoughts as heavily bias. Suspected motivation I think is the thought that civilization was not possible without religion. That thought terrifies u even more than the thought of God. U will not allow that thought to be entertained by anybody. Very Richard Dawkins like. Dawky is what I'll call u if I ever feel the need to respond to u which I doubt. Though Dawky is a good nickname. I like it. LoL
Im just noticing there are some voices of reason and truth up in here, up in here. People have thought about this logically. They’re also being suppressed I see.
My apologies. Still learning who is who. I thought everyone was a one eyed atheists in here. Im going through the posts now... I will be engaging
FACTS. TRUTH. KNOWLEDGE. UP IN HERE
Im excited as this Lama in learning there are rational people up in here, up in here