In the 14 -15 responses you've had with me in this thread, I don't believe I've glossed over any point you've made. Definitely not intentionally.
Here's what you've said :
1. indicated your opinion that a sympathizers coalition with the intolerant was broadly and globally destructive, not constructive.
2. extremist that are intolerant shouldn't be allowed to steer policy decisions
3. We should not tolerate intolerance
4. I'm mis-defining tolerance as right wing ipso facto tolerance
5. I'm mis-defining reverse racism as racism
6. I'm single minded and implied I'm not open to other trains of thought
7. The sjw side is right, and bitching about the means used to achieve a greater equality has always been the refuge of those seeking to oppose it.
8. Affirmative action isn't discrimination
Does that categorize it well enough? Doesn't really seem like you're talking to my points. I don't really have a script I'm following but you haven't really invested enough in the conversation to give me another train of thought to contemplate.
So I agree with 1,2 . Clarified 3,4,5 and 8. I disagree with 6 and 7 and you didn't support them, so I have nothing to rebut. I've tried talking to your points and I value your opinion, even when we differ. I think it's a little disingenuous to imply I'm not trying to see your side of it though.
Here's what you've said :
1. indicated your opinion that a sympathizers coalition with the intolerant was broadly and globally destructive, not constructive.
2. extremist that are intolerant shouldn't be allowed to steer policy decisions
3. We should not tolerate intolerance
4. I'm mis-defining tolerance as right wing ipso facto tolerance
5. I'm mis-defining reverse racism as racism
6. I'm single minded and implied I'm not open to other trains of thought
7. The sjw side is right, and bitching about the means used to achieve a greater equality has always been the refuge of those seeking to oppose it.
8. Affirmative action isn't discrimination
Does that categorize it well enough? Doesn't really seem like you're talking to my points. I don't really have a script I'm following but you haven't really invested enough in the conversation to give me another train of thought to contemplate.
So I agree with 1,2 . Clarified 3,4,5 and 8. I disagree with 6 and 7 and you didn't support them, so I have nothing to rebut. I've tried talking to your points and I value your opinion, even when we differ. I think it's a little disingenuous to imply I'm not trying to see your side of it though.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
