(December 28, 2018 at 10:49 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(December 28, 2018 at 10:11 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: That's nice, dear...but what logical fallacy can you identify, and what's wrong with the criteria established by the definition of the term, itself?
I already pointed it out. I didn't assert any evidence. Do you want the technical name for the fallacy?
No reason to attempt to provide something that isn't adequately defined. In this case "evidence", it would be a waste of time trying to pick and choose what might be considered adequate. If it's not objective, then I'm not interested. If someone else is, then target them for it.
Yes, max...for the third time, lol...can you identify whatever logical fallacy you think you were dealing with in the quoted text?
What are you talking about, not adequately defined? Can you identify what it is, precisely, that makes the definition of the term evidence inadequate?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
