I have noticed a trend in theists.
The argument seems to be that anything existing at all is evidence for god.
It is a stupid argument and a sign of desperation.
What is more likely some natural phenomenon created the universe or a supernatural being? The natural process wins hands down. We can witness natural processes everyday but no supernatural process has ever been proven to exist.
And there is never an explanation of why the supernatural is a better answer, they just assert that it is.
They never say how the supernatural being did the creating, where it was where it got the stuff, it just did coz its awesome (apparently).
It is a non-answer, a childs answer to complex issues and seems to need no proof to support it in the simplistic eyes of believers.
The argument seems to be that anything existing at all is evidence for god.
It is a stupid argument and a sign of desperation.
What is more likely some natural phenomenon created the universe or a supernatural being? The natural process wins hands down. We can witness natural processes everyday but no supernatural process has ever been proven to exist.
And there is never an explanation of why the supernatural is a better answer, they just assert that it is.
They never say how the supernatural being did the creating, where it was where it got the stuff, it just did coz its awesome (apparently).
It is a non-answer, a childs answer to complex issues and seems to need no proof to support it in the simplistic eyes of believers.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.