(January 1, 2019 at 10:15 am)downbeatplumb Wrote:(January 1, 2019 at 7:26 am)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: I guess you could always write a letter to M-W and ask them why they won't put better quality definitions in their dictionaries. Maybe tell them why they didn't do a good enough job so they know not to make the same mistake. Maybe they'll even recall all of their dictionaries and send out a public apology.
So you admit that the definitions are unsatisfying.
I am left just as baffled by what you say believe in as before.
Can you please clarify what you believe a god is and how it goes about "godding"
What definitions are unsatisfying? I don't read a dictionary to in some way satisfy an urge of mine. Dictionaries are relatively unbiased sources. When I'm online, I mostly stick with dictionary.com and M-W. Sometimes Cambridge or Oxford, but not nearly as much. Sometimes when you want to apply a definition more liberally, one may define something with just a bit more depth, but all-in-all, the major ones are all pretty good.
What is godding? Sorry, not familiar with that term, but rather than go through the dictionary spiel again, I'll just give you the opportunity to define it.