(January 9, 2019 at 12:02 am)Nihilist Virus Wrote:(January 8, 2019 at 11:32 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: Right. We are insufficient on our own. That doesn't mean we are always wrong, but we aren't always right either. So why put everything on unreliable beings?
The rest are open to interpretation. Rational ideas can lead to a wrong conclusion, just as irrational choices can lead to the right result. Evidence can be helpful, but it can also be detrimental if interpreted wrong. Science is sometimes superstition, and sometimes what we assume to be superstition ends up being the science of tomorrow.
What progress are you suggesting we've made? I see a volatile world, but maybe we view the world differently.
Insufficient for what?
Understanding the whole of things.
