(January 11, 2019 at 12:26 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote:(January 7, 2019 at 9:29 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote: If it was a typo, and you identified it as such, then what's the issue? But honestly, it's unclear what you are talking about. What post? If there was a typo, then no problem. Just assume it was an accident and we can both move on.
In post #75, BrianSoddingBoru4 pointed out that Clarke should have known because he was being sued for it.
In post #76, you asked Boru how he knew Clarke knew.
Following were a series of posts where other people were talking about the lawsuit, which Clark must have known about, and you were still being mystified at 'how do we know he knew' in a way that didn't follow the lawsuit issue, so it sounded like you were wondering how others could be sure Clarke was aware that he was being sued. You were still talking about whether Clarke knew before the lawsuit, and they were talking about whether Clarke knew he was being sued.
At least that's how it seemed to me, that you didn't pick up on the fact they were talking about his knowledge of the lawsuit, not his knowledge of the rape at the time it happened.
Of course he knew about the lawsuit. If you understand that I'm referring to the actual rape incidents, as mentioned previously in the conversation, then all should be well. That's why I don't get why you keep bringing it up. But I'll just take the fall for it so we can all move on. Sorry about the confusion. All good now?
