RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
January 21, 2019 at 3:10 pm
(This post was last modified: January 21, 2019 at 3:12 pm by CDF47.)
(January 21, 2019 at 11:34 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote:(January 21, 2019 at 10:19 am)CDF47 Wrote: The test was when the functionality of DNA was discovered in 1957.What?
I'm sorry, could you try using a different tack on you explanation?
That people were investigating the 'Chemistry' of the DNA goes back a lot further than Watson and Crik (sp?) working out the shape of the thing.
Also... what would/might falsify I.D.?
Not at work.
Nothing could falsify the information found in DNA.
(January 21, 2019 at 2:24 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: How did the designer do the designing?
what was its process and how did it implement the design.
If things are "designed" why the inefficient use of so many sperm, most of which die.
Why does it appear as though things evolved both in the fossil and DNA record.
Why does all the science not support the idea that things are designed?
Evolution to an extent is part of the implementation of the design as I have stated. There are natural processes used by the Designer.
(January 21, 2019 at 2:33 pm)T0 Th3 M4X Wrote:(January 21, 2019 at 7:51 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: We don't have moronic disagreements, because I wouldn't marry a moron. See, I got to choose my wife, I don't get to choose what morons join af, huh?
Who said you were the one who married the moron?
I'm sure she's a fantastic person Charlie Brown. But you on the other hand...
I'm actually really surprised you brought your wife into a discussion like this. So just going to try to tiptoe around her as the subject. And on that note, just going to leave this alone for now.
(January 21, 2019 at 2:24 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: How did the designer do the designing?
what was its process and how did it implement the design.
If things are "designed" why the inefficient use of so many sperm, most of which die.
Why does it appear as though things evolved both in the fossil and DNA record.
Why does all the science not support the idea that things are designed?
"All the science does not support" is a false premise. If the question asserts something that is illogical, then you can't expect a logical response to answer the question as intended. On the basis that what you're claiming to be new "science", then the burden would be on you to prove your claims.
Agreed.
The LORD Exists: http://www.godandscience.org/
Intelligent Design (Short Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVkdQhNdzHU
Intelligent Design (Longer Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzj8iXiVDT8
Intelligent Design (Short Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVkdQhNdzHU
Intelligent Design (Longer Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzj8iXiVDT8
