(March 1, 2019 at 6:50 am)Acrobat Wrote:(March 1, 2019 at 5:22 am)Little lunch Wrote: I'm wondering what the evidence against George Pell actually was.
Surely he couldn't be convicted on one man's testimony alone after thirty years.
I'm not on George Pell's side, if there was irrefutable evidence I would be all for him getting a bullet to the head straight after the guilty verdict.
But what if he's innocent?
I've mixed with the lower end of humanity and met many people who would convincingly tell lies for money or pity or just to make excuses for the fuckups in their life.
I was wondering the same thing, only one person has actually claimed Pell ever abused him, and I'm not aware of any evidence beyond this persons testimony.
I'm curious everyone else knows what other evidence was used in the case, because I couldn't find any.
There were two accusers but one died.
You wont find much of any other evidence because whatever evidence was laid before the jury is not public yet.
