A question

[Statler Waldorf]

Listen, you little fuck-nugget. There have been numerous times that you have pissed people right the fuck off and, surprising even to myself, I have argued on your behalf because you do not break the rules.

Doing your job and standing up for someone who does not break any rules, how noble of you.

or I will lay aside my ethics.

You already have by alluding to information that was given to you only because of the assurance of full confidentiality.

You do realize that trying to convince me you haven't cleared your cookies in more than a year isn't helping your case, right?

I’ve never cleaned out my cookies. My wife’s old profile says she was online today and the computer she used to access it with is at her mom’s house. My wife has not been there in four months. Figure that one out Einstein.

Stop being a fucking punk who changes his story every time it suits his argument and I will be sure to stop.

My story has never changed, I have worked for the USDA for over two years now, I got married in March(something I even announced to a few users on here in PM). Stop accusing me of things I have not done.

Assumptions? Stat, I could have, at any time between then and now, presented any assumptions I had about you. I know your real name, your user names on other sites and the fact that you only use this name here so that you can tool around these forums like king shit of turd island. I never disclosed any of this and yet you are saying I am a hypocrite making assumptions? Hmm. Furthermore, I don't complain about people. I complain about you, you annoying little cock.

This is actually the name I use on forums to prevent unethical people like you from trying to steal my identity. This just happens to be one of the only forums I am still active on. I have used it on three others I can think of. That is why I was uncomfortable in disclosing my other username to you guys but was given full assurance it would only be used to resolve the issue at hand. I guess that was not the case, apparently it has been used to try and falsely prove I am a liar.

Who do you suggest I take that up with?

Whomever you have to give account to, you are not the top dog here, I know that.

Who should be ashamed? I assume you mean the entire staff. I'm just the one who happened to be here when you popped in, so don't get your panties up your ass on my account.

Nope, you and Rsaeesna are the only two who have used it inappropriately. I disclosed the information to Tack and Darwinian because I trust them. I am done talking to you, you are not worth my time. I can't believe I wasted my 1000th post on you I was saving that! :-)

---

Perhaps, but there is evidence to the contrary.

No there isn’t, people who met their future spouses on dating sites having out of date dating profiles is not evidence those people are not now married.

I'm sorry, that was complete gibberish. Really. All that above means is that Internet Explorer keeps cookies and histories local to the user.

The dating site’s online status is tied to the browser’s cookies, hence why my wife’s out of date and inactive profile says she is online right now even though she is 5,000 miles away from the computer she used to use to access that site. Her mom uses that same Windows profile and browser daily.

However, the websites that you visit do indeed display a last logged on date independent of your computer.

It’s not independent of the computer if the user’s windows profile saves cookies from their last login to that particular website.

Besides, even if I had logged onto a dating site, which I have not since March, that would not prove that I was not married or that I was being unfaithful.