The most awkward conversation ever

[Drich]

sport, give me the benefit of the doubt.. If i say something that seems way way too obvious then maybe look a little deeper or ask a question... Thomas being a brother of Christ was a gnostic teaching/pov. however in mark Jesus' sibblings where named  James, Joseph (Joses), Judas (Jude), and Simon as brothers of Jesus (Greek: ἀδελφοὶ, translit. adelphoi, lit. 'brothers').[1] Also mentioned, but not named, are sisters of Jesus. Some scholars[who?] argue that these brothers, especially James,[2] held positions of special honor in the early Christian church.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brothers_of_Jesus

Which again would make all of jesus brother and sister's half brothers and sisters as their father was joseph.

Yes, siblings were named in Mark but Thomas and Didymus were not names and there is also Gospel of Thomas that begins "These are the hidden words that the living Jesus spoke. And Didymus Judas Thomas wrote them down." In the original Greek version, it is written: "Judas, who is also called Thomas."
So the actual name is Didymus Judas Thomas - Judas, the twin.

when was this gospel of thomas written/found? oh that's right 1945 AD matter of fact a whole library of gnostic gospels where found then. most of which date back to 500 years after christ. while the thomas gospel is said to date to 1300's.. doesn't mean it is not older, it's just the 1300s copy is the oldest intact version.

---

No, it's not a liberal view. It's a compliance with the law view. You are thinking like a goy. 'Liberal' is an individual thinking that they can interpret the law however they please. 'Liberal' is believing that you can obey one commandment by breaking several others. Strict compliance with the law isn't about going around killing people just because you're certain that they violated the law.

oy, again with the name calling. i ask for proof he gives me this.. This is proof where you studied? calling others names till they concede your point?!?!