(October 7, 2011 at 5:05 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: If procreation is good for the species, then non procreation is bad. Already we have a moral stance.
Not quite. Sometimes non-reproduction can do more good than harm. Too much reproduction can do serious harm, too little can be as troublesome.
For us, it would actually be more beneficial for more of us to not reproduce.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.