(April 7, 2019 at 1:20 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Also i pointed why this supposed fact is irrelevant(April 7, 2019 at 1:04 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: Go look
I did.
Quote:as you won't accept what I say.
I don't accept it because it's factually wrong.
Quote:Show your work.
I have done, links included. Scroll back.
Quote:Answer - vehicles win - hands down.
Not true.
Quote:The most killed in total? By bombs.
True worldwide, but irrelevant to the discussion.
Quote:There are more INCIDENTS by gun - but the numbers killed are relatively low per incident.
How can you not see that this isn't the point? Over the course of a year, more people are killed deliberately by firearms than are deliberately killed by any other method. To refresh your memory, 74% of homicides in the US are committed with firearms. Scroll back, there's a link.
Quote:Getting rid of the guns would prompt terrorists to use more effective means like fire, bombs and vehicles.
Terrorists already use those means (as you've pointed out), but that's irrelevant to the discussion because (as I've pointed out), I'm not suggesting getting rid of guns.
Quote:Does this mean do we need more guns you ask? Don' t be a cunt. No, it does not mean that. It means that getting rid of guns is a poor way to combat terrorism. It always has been.
But it is as it' s always been - a good first step at enslaving the masses.
Irrelevant, same reason.
Boru
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb