RE: Crucifixion question
April 15, 2019 at 12:37 pm
(This post was last modified: April 15, 2019 at 1:00 pm by Lemon Curry.)
(April 15, 2019 at 12:31 pm)Drich Wrote:(April 15, 2019 at 11:10 am)Lemon Curry Wrote: Yeh, that's the assertion. Where's the proof?
This should be good.
Sorry sport that is a quotation not an assertion.
Assertion:
Dictionary
as·ser·tion
/əˈsərSH(ə)n/
noun
here is the defination of quotation:
- a confident and forceful statement of fact or belief.
quo·ta·tion
/ˌkwōˈtāSH(ə)n/
noun
Now, since I quoted mat 27, mat 27 becomes the source material, therefore in of itself is indeed proof of the statement I quoted. such as: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se...ersion=ERV
- 1.
a group of words taken from a text or speech and repeated by someone other than the original author or speaker.
do you understand? I am saying the proof of my quote can be determined by whether or not mat 27 say what I posted. Now if you seek verification to what mat 27 states that is another matter. but this one is closed.
I corrected you misidentification of assertion, by correctly identifying a quote and then provided proof the quote was quoted accurate.
That said if you want verification of this event then just make a request.
The babble is an assertion. It makes statements of belief. It contains no proof: the effect of evidence sufficient to persuade a reasonable person that a particular fact exists. 2 : the establishment or persuasion by evidence that a particular fact exists. So, christard, once again, we have heard the assertions, where's the proof?
I don't know whether I need a bottle in front of me or a frontal lobotomy.
