(May 2, 2019 at 3:20 pm)madog Wrote:(May 2, 2019 at 2:37 pm)Jehanne Wrote: I never claimed that. What I have claimed is that a scientific understanding of the Universe is based upon the Conservation Laws. If a single instance of a macroscopic violation can be repeatedly replicated under controlled conditions,
All you have shown is the laws are maybe false or .... Why posit a God? You are replacing a mystery with a bigger mystery.
The time to consider a God is when you can show it is even possible. Argument from incredulity
This is a "bridge" that neither of us will ever encounter, let alone cross; it's all a disagreement over a nonexistent hypothetical:
Quote:“If it turns out that there is a God...the worst that you can say about him is that basically he's an underachiever.”
― Woody Allen