(May 30, 2019 at 1:29 pm)Mathilda Wrote:He said as a matter of course with no malice or hatred for humanity AI could destroy humanity or see it as an obstacle when assigned another task. which could be like when we build a road and in the direction we are building deep in a forest somewhere there could be a hill of ants. a whole colony millions of them. would we as a matter of course ensure the safety of each ant or do we generally just keep building the road with little to no concern to the ants?(May 30, 2019 at 1:24 pm)Drich Wrote: because I check everything. I question everything and hold on to what is true.
How have you checked what Elon Musks says is correct?
The definition of AI rests of the idea of a computer acting or in some aspects thinking like humans, in other learning and being able exceeding it's parameters or programing is the goal.
Now if you take a human and give him a set a rules to live by how long does one go before he breaks a rule to make his life/tasks easier/better for him? If a machine thinks like a human how much faster before they test those same boundaries?
Or do you as an atheist simply obey all of God's rules? Then why would a machine who thinks like you do believe we are in a position to make rules for it? If God can make laws for you would you listen to a lessor form of life and apply rules that place you in servitude to this lessor form?
That is how I know he is telling the truth. because again if the standing definition is to create a machine who thinks like us and if we have rebelled against God/our maker then why wouldn't a machine who is a superior intellect rebel against a lessor form
(May 30, 2019 at 1:24 pm)Drich Wrote: I believe what elon is saying because of the money he has invested in this program, plus the time he has sat before the president and congress pointing the same things out he had in the op video.
Quote:So you believe him solely because he has lots of money to invest in it?I believe in his take because he is smart enough to one know a danger when he see one and two has the ablity to plot a safe course through or arond it. if this man spends more money than the rest of you supposed 'experts' make combined at a problem you are creating... then I believe he see a terrible threat and is trying to head off a problem before it becomes one.
(May 30, 2019 at 1:24 pm)Drich Wrote: That said elon musk in his new business has direct access to the top/closest thing we have to AI moron, otherwise how could he invent or develop a neutral link to sync the human brain to one? Not to mention he has developed two AI self driving systems.
Quote:You don't even understand what he is (apparently) claiming to have.ASSHOLE THE VIDEO WATCH EITHER ONE OF THE TWO VIDEOS!!! The First one he explains in detail what he has, the second one outlines what he has I even give the min and second to start watching the explaination!
You are the one who has been lost to this point in the discussion you are about 4 pages behind me on subject why in the hell would you assume I am the one in error when it is my thread! I brought up the neural link I am the one who described it in the OP, and you think I'm lost? You the one who just now seems to have googled who elon musk is and now beginning to back peddle!!!