(June 23, 2019 at 4:35 pm)Chad32 Wrote: My opinion is far from professional. I just don't think we'd be getting anywhere good if we took the woman who ran on status quo as her goal. Of course now one of the biggest dem contenders in Biden, who is running on more or less the same thing. The bar that Trump set is so low, you could be a lot better than him, rather than a little, and still be really bad for the country. I remember being afraid that if we got Hillary for president, we'd be going into WW 3 over Syria. Now Trump wants war with Iran, and Venezuela, and has a hard on for Kimmy in North Korea, but I don't think we're on the verge of WW3
Since the Clinton isn't in office, your suppositions are meaningless. I'd be willing to bet that the Clinton wouldn't have done 1% of the stupid shit that the tweeto has done. Who are you voting for in 2020? Against the possible Vs the probable (oh, wait, proven!) stupidity? WW3 is far less likely under the Clinton, and if you don't get that then I don't know what to say.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
