Haipule

[Anomalocaris]

If I say that the rib of a human is filled with multipotent DNA--why argue? Science doesn't disagree!



If I say that rib bones grow back if the sheath that contains that bone is left intact---why argue? Science doesn't disagree!

Well then, QUIT ACCUSING ME OF BEING A TROLL!

Non sequitur

If you say that bringing up such subjects makes you a troll because of the biblical Adam and Eve account. Then so be it! It's not my problem! 

No.  We say your cherry picking efforts to buttress the Bible, or in particular the parts of bible that speaks of things with idiotic domineering certitude but which the writers of the Bible has no possible ways of knowing, makes you as worthless to talk to as any troll.

You don’t have to be a troll to be the equal of any troll in being a dead weight on any serious forum.

If the bible says that man and flowers existed at the same time, never before, and so does the scientific geological record: I don't have a problem and neither do you! It's just a fact!

Uh, no.  Science does not say the same thing because geological record does not say the same thing.   Bible is bullshit in this and virtually every others.

Modern Man existed for perhaps 200,000 years.   Our oldest hominid ancestor Is may be 6 million years old.  Oldest ape is maybe 25 million years old.   Oldest primate is perhaps 50 million years old.   The first flower definitely existed no later 140 million years ago, and may have existed as early as 200-250 million years ago.

Dinosaurs of the Cretaceous definitely dined on flowering plants and pollinating insects.  I wouldn’t be surprised if some dinosaurs liked honey.   Oldest flower is definitely older than many dinosaurs, and may in fact be older than the oldest dinosaurs. 

So put it in perspective, The oldest flowers are roughly 1000 times older than the oldest homo sapient.