RE: How about this..
July 29, 2019 at 6:06 pm
(This post was last modified: July 29, 2019 at 6:11 pm by I_am_not_mafia.)
(July 29, 2019 at 5:27 pm)Drich Wrote: I was an atheist..
[snip]
... then went into atheism for a long long time. Then I heard that christians had direct access to God, so I demanded a meeting to every christian that went to my high school via my fists and boots. I wanted to spit in his eye.. maybe take a poke at him..
How could you have wanted to spit in God's eye and take a poke at something that if you didn't believe he existed?
This has been pointed out to you repeatedly. You weren't an atheist.You just weren't following any particular religion.
Either you did not believe a god existed, or you did but were angry at it. You can't have both.
(July 29, 2019 at 6:02 pm)Drich Wrote: So please tell me how what I said violates the 2nd law..
What you have said has changed so many times, you need to be specific about what you described. First you say you invented a perpetual motion machine, then you try to redefine what a perpetual motion machine is, and then you claim it was a ruse yet still refer to it as a perpetual motion machine.
A perpetual motion machine violates the second law of thermodynamics as has been stated already in this thread.
What you described was not a perpetual motion machine and therefore does not violate the second law of thermodynamics.
If you are claiming that your idea is a perpetual motion machine then you are then one claiming that it violates the second law of thermodynamics.
At the moment you're just trying to make a huge strawman argument and fooling nobody.