RE: Are Myths Valuable?
July 29, 2019 at 8:58 pm
(This post was last modified: July 29, 2019 at 9:00 pm by vulcanlogician.)
(July 28, 2019 at 1:14 pm)Alan V Wrote:(July 26, 2019 at 10:16 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: I mean something more like C.G. Jung meant. Jung thought that by examining ancient myths, one may find profound truths concerning the "inner reality" of the human psyche. Do you agree with Jung here?
I don't agree with Jung. I suspect it's mindgames all the way down.
Can you give us an example of what you consider a valuable myth? I think it might be helpful to work from specific examples.
I think the Hindu myth of Kali says some things about human nature and human essence that behavioral science is only learning bit by bit.
If you want a list:
1) Arachne (Greek)- already mentioned in OP
2) Shiva's eyes being covered by Parvati on the mountain top (Hindu)
3) Narcissus and Echo (Greek)
4) Pandora (Greek)
5) Hercules (Greek)
6) Sisyphus (Greek)
7) How Ganesha lost his tusk (Hindu)
Which one would you like to discuss? I mean, do you want me to go point by point through a myth and describe its deep meaningfulness along the way? I mean, I can do that if you want. But what purpose would it serve?
It isn't mind games all the way down if you are being honest in your search for meaning. People who claim these myths are literally true, for instance, or use them to become a religious authority over others ARE playing mind games. And (with them) it IS mind games all the way down. But let's forget about these people for a moment. Let's be atheists who are looking for a nonliteral truth in these myths... but a truth nonetheless.
If you want to get specific, let's talk about the Kali myth. Or, if you'd rather discuss another one, pick one of the myths in the numbered list. I think Jung has a point. And I'd be happy to treat any objections to his thesis.


