How about this..

[Drich]

7) then someone said something about a PMM and I felt challenged to come up with one

8) so I looked up the definition to define the parameters of my build and it's scope.. So i googled Perpetual motion and when you do you get this from google:
Dictionary
per·pet·u·al mo·tion
/pərˈpeCH(əw)əl ˈmōSHən/
noun

1. a state in which movement or action is or appears to be continuous and unceasing.
   "the planet is in perpetual motion"
   
   • the motion of a hypothetical machine which, once activated, would run forever unless subject to an external force or to wear.
     "the age-old quest for the secret of perpetual motion"
     
     

Thank you for confirming my suspicion.

Before googling, you had no idea what ppms are all about. Everybody else however had.
After googling you still didnt figure that the qualifier for ppm is not to run forever but to "do work indefinitely without an energy source", and that "This kind of machine is impossible, as it would violate the first or second law of thermodynamics.". At this point your quest could and should have stopped and the topic finished.

But no

you went along making shit up, without having the slightest clue*.

Your grandiosity shows when you thought that you could end the "age old quest for the secret of perpetual motion" by thinking hard for a few minutes and make up a bad geothermal plant. Its the hallmark of the uneducated to think they are smarter than everybody else who ever thought about a certain problem for the past thousand years.

You know, when i went to university i constantly tried to disprove my professors, because i thought i was so smart, and because i wanted to show it to everyone. It took me several semesters and lots of humble pie to finally shut the fuck up and listen and learn and acknowledge that these guys are way smarter than i was. I decided its more wise to first learn everything, really, really understand, and then come back and point out flaws in Newtons or Einsteins theories, but guess what: i found nothing and it all fits together.

And thats why i know you never saw a university from the inside, and thats why i can predict you, and thats why i know that unless you eat a bit of humble pie and fucking listen to get some education before you start to criticize some established science, as long as you dont realize that....you will be stuck in stupid, perpetually.

...and that, my friend, is not an attempt to attack or insult you but some fucking good advice you better think about twice.

*and you didnt listen when i told you exactly that: an (attempted) ppm will viloate the 1s, 2nd or both laws of thermodynamics.

This is where you are wrong. again I look up everything so as not to taint what i say with personal bias. Something every one of you is ALWAYS guilty of.

For example I say the word slave and you all automatically do not think of the word slave as the definition intends.. You assume the word being used is chattel slavery. most of you don't even know what chattel slavery is only the word slave has taken that meaning because people like yourself reappropriate this word and do not understand the full meaning rather you assign meaning and built a world view on top of it.

 Then because I am well verses in truth and in fact I could make a statement that life on modern earth would not be possible by slaves. and we all use slaves directly in our lives at some point every day..

Now, to me before I make a statement like that I will look up the word to define what I can and can not include in that list. 
slave
 noun
\ ˈslāv [/url] \
Definition of slave
 (Entry 1 of 4)
1: a person held in servitude as the chattel of another

2: one that is completely subservient to a dominating influence

3: a device (such as the printer of a computer) that is directly responsive to another

4: [url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/drudge]DRUDG

Ever driven a car? ever rode the bus? ever use a printer or computer? then you are guilty of using a slave.

While this is an appropriate use of the word, it is not the inbox thinking you are use to.

I look up everything because On my own I know I am not an authority, so I align my knowledge with that of an indisputable source. this also allows me to come in at an angle not common with rank infile thinkers... I often times give you a different perspective on the same idea.

That is all I did here with the PMM. I took an exist thing and striped it of it's need for a replenishing fuel source. Just to point out the ad hoc tactics you are still trying to employ because you just now figured out what everything has been about for 10 days now.. and like I said in the out line, you are pushing back like the smart guys did on day 5.

(I did not insult his intelligence I only complimented his peers to coming to a conclusion 5 day before he did)

9