How about this..

[Brian37]

Everything Drich post makes sense now.

Drich believes physics, but not spelling and, oh, say, diction, is best learned using a dictionary.

wow..

https://www.superteachertools.us/jeopard...ame=492838

I think i am in pretty good company.
Disney 
da vinci
beethoven
 lennon 
speilberg
grandon 
henry ford
Gramm 
bell 
edison 
einstein
churchhill
thomas jefferson
FDR 
George washington
Not to mention Brandson of virgin records/galatic 
and another list of scientist you've probably never heard of:
http://mentalfloss.com/article/87068/12-...tter-place


Not to mention my own accomplishments that again if you are ever in orlando I can prove to you via a walk through of my production facility and sales area where we build and sell speciality refrigeration equipment all over north america and the islands. Stuff I designed marketed and sell. Stuff that does not exist till I make it exist. so yeah..

i can indeed respect physics IE design product that holds -20 *f  then 35*F in a cooler and a 180*f warming bay with 60*F driver compartment little more than a few inches separating them, and oh, you can not add any generators pull more than 30 amps from the truck alternator not can you add any accessory or secondary motors or engines. plus if you modify the engine in any way you void the warranty. or if you change or modify the current ac system you void the manufactures warranty.

So again, yeah i can respect and build something that fits all of those parameters and give two squirts about how you may have been taught to judge intelligence.

12

---

What has "slave" to do with what i wrote and the fact that you were 100% called out and figured out?
Right, ab-so-fucking-lutely-nothing.
Oh, your big letters are impressive....not.

try reading it... the post explains itself very well.

all you have to do is read it this time.

This is where you are wrong. again I look up everything so as not to taint what i say with personal bias. Something every one of you is ALWAYS guilty of.

For example I say the word slave and you all automatically do not think of the word slave as the definition intends.. You assume the word being used is chattel slavery. most of you don't even know what chattel slavery is only the word slave has taken that meaning because people like yourself reappropriate this word and do not understand the full meaning rather you assign meaning and built a world view on top of it.

 Then because I am well verses in truth and in fact I could make a statement that life on modern earth would not be possible by slaves. and we all use slaves directly in our lives at some point every day..

Now, to me before I make a statement like that I will look up the word to define what I can and can not include in that list. 
slave
 noun
\ ˈslāv [/url] \
Definition of slave
 (Entry 1 of 4)
1: a person held in servitude as the chattel of another

2: one that is completely subservient to a dominating influence

3: a device (such as the printer of a computer) that is directly responsive to another

4: DRUDG

Ever driven a car? ever rode the bus? ever use a printer or computer? then you are guilty of using a slave.

While this is an appropriate use of the word, it is not the inbox thinking you are use to.

I look up everything because On my own I know I am not an authority, so I align my knowledge with that of an indisputable source. this also allows me to come in at an angle not common with rank infile thinkers... I often times give you a different perspective on the same idea.

That is all I did here with the PMM. I took an exist thing and striped it of it's need for a replenishing fuel source. Just to point out the ad hoc tactics you are still trying to employ because you just now figured out what everything has been about for 10 days now.. and like I said in the out line, you are pushing back like the smart guys did on day 5.

(I did not insult his intelligence I only complimented his peers to coming to a conclusion 5 day before he did)

13

---

Drich, we cannot dumb it down any further for you than this.

That was then, this is now. The humans that wrote and sold that mythology back then didn't know any better. Just like the Ancient Egyptians could not have known that the sun was not pulled across the sky by a God named Ra.

You do not get to blame us for questioning the mythology written in antiquity that we were not around to write or sell.

Again.. the bible is a map. Not a science book not a history book not a book of the universe, it is a map that only relevance has to do with whether or not it takes you where it promises to take you or not.

Meaning all maps are valid no matter how old they are so long as the accurately describe or depict what it is they represent.

this map the bible promises to set you before God.

I followed the map, and I sat before God. why else would I be here? Why else would I spend 6 to 8 hours a day reading and research the truth so you can make your own decisions? I am here on this side of the discussion because I found something you did not find and I can tell you how to find it too if that is something you are willing to hear.

14

---

I have no "faith" in people. I have knowledge that my fellow humans are BOTH capable of cruelty and compassion. Both of those behaviors are observable. I would prefer my fellow humans lean to compassion, but on a planet of 7 billion, that will never be a perfect utopia. 

Your "faith" is the argument that you got it right, and if all 7 billion of the rest of us just accepted your bullshit, the world would be a utopia. Problem with religion is that everyone of every religion claims they got it right.

I know my species is perfectly capable of compassion and non violence. I also know we don't always do that. 

I simply do not assign anything humans do good or do bad to old mythology.

Religions, of all labels, teach their respective followers to defend the label,  which is fucking absurd to me. All 7 billion of us are humans. And every nation, both friend and foe alike have hospitals and prisons.

you could not be more wrong.

Faith in what I believe has nothing to do with a better world.

God gave us the keys to this world and we handed them over to satan. Satan does not rule hell. the bible explicitly tells us satan is punished by hell which is the only reason it is eternal as he is the only one fit for eternal damnation. the rest of us are destroyed by hell.

This world is satan's realm his kingdom. if it where not then it would have meant nothing to christ to be tempted by him (bow to me and I will give you all of the kingdoms of man) so nothing you do is going to make the world better. as a direct result Christian as described in the bible is not a morality driven religion. it is not a lists of dos and donts despite what some version of the religion say. The christian in the bible is about atonement and the next life. because in this one we are slaves who are owned by sin till our deaths.. however once we die we are resurrected in christ where sin no longer has hold. and we can be who we want. meaning live in that utopia

but here and now know christianity is not according tot he bible a religion of laws. in fact Jesus himself only give us two to follow. while the jews had hundreds. if we where a religion of laws then we would have whole book detailing and out lining the law like the jews and even muslims have. we have 2.




15

You are an IDIOT quoting Thomas Jefferson.

"Whence arises the morality of the atheist? It is idle to say, as some do, that no such thing exists."

And please forget about his letter to the Danbury Baptists.

And fuck the Barbary Treaty Article 11. And fuck the Constitution's oath of office "no religious test."

All non Christians in America must accept a Christian theocracy as to which all non Christians are mere guests at best.

Sorry D-Rich, but our Constitution DOES NOT, and never has set up a Christian theocracy.

If you want to live under a government run on Religion try Saudi Arabia or Iran.