RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 5, 2019 at 12:45 pm
(This post was last modified: August 5, 2019 at 12:47 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(August 5, 2019 at 12:25 pm)LastPoet Wrote: So John Breezy is a pigeon. I saw that on the first post. The avalanche of evolutionary facts are like fleas to his overwhelming ignorance. Heh, social sciences like psychology are useful, my suster is a psychologist and she's doing a fine job helping people overcome addictions at work. She even invited me to do a lecture at her work, because of my past recovery from drug use. That's good tech job right there.
I learnt many things about that weak science with her, she doesn't accept qualia as decent work in psych research and she is a christian (catholics are christian, right?)
So we see, since the old "eye argument" was shot down, our OP decided to move the goalposts. God of the Gaps.
Any word that is somewhat mysterious and vaguely Latin sounding is good enough to accept as a righteous trope for god.