Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)

[The Valkyrie]

You are right that personal motivations are irrelevant to the truth or falsehood of a proposition, however, they are quite insightful with regard to examining how a person judges the quality of available evidence for one particular proposition compared to another. Motivation can have implications with regard to erroneous reasoning, which is why I dig. I notice you’ve ignored my questions for a third time now. I’ll try drawing closer to my point a quicker way. Do you accept the current scientific theory of evolution as the best explanation for the diversity of life on planet earth?

The theory of evolution does not explain the origin of life on earth. Science refute the theory of evolution. This theory is only an illusion.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXu-f_rNQ54

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlXhMqJeuTQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LG0oD0TYzhA&t=2s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amfa-EjMKX4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Pvuct9TrpA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrHDOmKPv80

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paPJKPY-tuc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ABm8kOrxQk&t=412s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPXUtYs5p1U


Or they say, "He has invented it!" No, they don't believe! If what they say is true, bring a similar story! Have they been created from nothing? Or are they the creators? Or have the heavens and the earth created? No, they are not convinced.

Koran 52:33-36

List of failures in this post (incomplete):

1. The Theory of Evolution does not try to explain the origins of life. That would be abiogenesis.

2. Youtube videos are not proof of anything apart from the fact that people made youtube videos.

3. Quotes from magic books fail every time.