Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)

[John 6IX Breezy]

A simple, straightforward conversation on the evolution of eyes has been made difficult for your inability to contain yourself to facts.

If this situation has been created by your religion, that’s a problem with your religion.  If, however, this situation is wholly your own responsibility, it’s a you problem.

At no point does this become a problem for evolution, or the board’s problem.

Ofc there’s more to vision than eyes, in species that possess the specific “more” you’re referring to, but in species that don’t....there isn’t.

I don't understand what you're talking about again.

But let me ask you this then, how can those species that lack "more" get "more?" Take a species of your choosing, and tell me what you think the next evolutionary step should be, if they were to evolve human-like eyes.