RE: Vision and Evolution (A Critique of Dawkins)
August 6, 2019 at 4:55 pm
(This post was last modified: August 6, 2019 at 5:03 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Sure, why not. There’s no rule stating that adaptations in the nervous system -must- conform to the theoretical limits of the eye.
Let’s use two examples of that. We have a nervous system capable of processing much better data than our sensory systems provide...and there are other species with access to what we would consider much better sensory data than we possess, whose nervous systems don’t even seem to be capable of processing the data we can.
Let’s use two examples of that. We have a nervous system capable of processing much better data than our sensory systems provide...and there are other species with access to what we would consider much better sensory data than we possess, whose nervous systems don’t even seem to be capable of processing the data we can.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
