RE: Where's the outrage?
August 8, 2019 at 1:55 pm
(This post was last modified: August 8, 2019 at 1:57 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(August 8, 2019 at 1:11 pm)BryanS Wrote:(August 8, 2019 at 1:01 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: You don't seem to understand.
I find both parties equally guilty - of pissing all over each other.
And both stick their noses up in the air and put in a smug air of superiority.
Me - I don't fit in either party - as I hold views that a party loyalist would find contrary - even though they are totally different subjects.
I.e. I am pro-gun and pro-choice (abortion). I am for wage equity for all, but against minimum wage.
(don't bother arguing those points here - they are simply examples and I won't argue them here)
I think what you are demonstrating here is that the parties have become more partisan and exclusionary than ever before. There is no room for debate and no room for differences of opinion. Anyone who is not ideologically pure is cast out as the "other". I never understood what abortion rights has to do with minimum wage, but apparently for some reason I do not understand, they are inextricably linked in our politics.
Bullshit.
Only the movers and shakers of one party coined terms like "RINO" for republican in name only. That was even before this party bent over, spread its cheek for an overt racist anti-science ignoramus.
(August 8, 2019 at 1:01 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:(August 8, 2019 at 11:52 am)Anomalocaris Wrote: If you are mostly for them, you are against us. Sound better?
Yes, If makes you sound so much less bad if you didn’t vote for Bush but defends the new Republican Party of racist ignoramus trump, which even bush deplored.
You don't seem to understand.
I find both parties equally guilty - of pissing all over each other.
And both stick their noses up in the air and put in a smug air of superiority.
Me - I don't fit in either party - as I hold views that a party loyalist would find contrary - even though they are totally different subjects.
I.e. I am pro-gun and pro-choice (abortion). I am for wage equity for all, but against minimum wage.
(don't bother arguing those points here - they are simply examples and I won't argue them here)
And you are wrong.
The party that did the assault, and the party assaulted, may both be covered in blood, they are not both guilty of assault.
