Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 23, 2025, 2:04 am
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Dual core, Quad core??

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Dual core, Quad core??
Kyuuketsuki Offline
Retired Staff
*****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 2721
Threads: 99
Joined: October 8, 2008
Reputation: 17
#18
RE: Dual core, Quad core??
June 3, 2009 at 2:41 pm
(June 3, 2009 at 2:33 pm)moleque Wrote: The problems with benchmarks is that they are limited.
UNIX systems have been around for 37 years.

The problem with people (especially evangelists) is they are biased!

(June 3, 2009 at 2:33 pm)moleque Wrote: Windows MSDOS is based upon TOPS-10.

Er ... so what? DOS is ancient history!

Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!

Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Dual core, Quad core??

Messages In This Thread
Dual core, Quad core?? - by Darwinian - May 6, 2009 at 3:35 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - May 6, 2009 at 3:48 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Darwinian - May 6, 2009 at 3:55 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - May 6, 2009 at 4:51 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - May 6, 2009 at 5:45 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - May 6, 2009 at 5:53 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - May 6, 2009 at 6:03 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by padraic - May 6, 2009 at 8:18 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - May 7, 2009 at 12:58 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by padraic - May 7, 2009 at 2:43 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 3, 2009 at 4:56 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 1:34 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 3, 2009 at 2:20 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - June 3, 2009 at 2:04 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 2:08 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 2:25 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 3, 2009 at 2:33 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 2:41 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 4, 2009 at 3:46 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 4:00 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 7:32 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 2:38 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 11:32 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 11:46 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 7:17 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 3:25 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 3:59 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 4:15 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 4:29 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 5:05 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 4, 2009 at 7:35 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 8:13 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 8:38 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 4, 2009 at 8:51 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 9:34 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 5, 2009 at 1:02 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 5, 2009 at 8:44 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 5, 2009 at 2:46 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 5, 2009 at 3:15 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - June 5, 2009 at 3:16 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 5, 2009 at 4:23 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 5, 2009 at 4:21 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 5, 2009 at 5:02 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 5, 2009 at 8:47 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 5, 2009 at 6:43 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 3:25 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 5, 2009 at 9:18 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 5, 2009 at 11:35 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2009 at 12:35 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:04 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 8:08 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:10 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 8:12 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:22 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 9:05 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 6, 2009 at 9:02 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 7, 2009 at 7:35 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:17 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 7, 2009 at 3:46 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - June 7, 2009 at 4:30 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 7, 2009 at 4:35 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)