RE: Van Tillian/Clarkian Presuppositional Apologetics.
October 14, 2011 at 9:20 pm
(This post was last modified: October 14, 2011 at 9:23 pm by DeistPaladin.)
(October 14, 2011 at 8:16 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: I don’t know whether all of these memories travel with me or not, all I know is that I am given a glorified body and mind on the new heaven and new earth.
Quote: And why can't those suffering from Alzheimer's access these indestructible memories located in the spirit?
Quote:Sin.
(October 14, 2011 at 8:24 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: I know his arguments tend to go over your head, but this is getting ridiculous.
Oh we understand them just fine. The logical fallacy, I've learned, it called the bare assertion fallacy.
It's not sufficient to posit god exists and then use that assumption to prove something else. You have to provide evidence for your assertions before you can use them to prove anything else.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
