RE: Easy comebacks ?
September 4, 2019 at 11:19 am
(This post was last modified: September 4, 2019 at 11:29 am by LadyForCamus.)
(September 4, 2019 at 10:55 am)Macoleco Wrote:(September 4, 2019 at 10:29 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Not to be rude, but if you think it’s stupid to actually educate yourself on what is contained in said fiction book before you debate someone who believes it’s non-fiction, then why are you here trying to glean info from the people who actually did take to time study its contents?
“I’m not going to read it; that’s stupid. Hey, people who HAVE read it! What does it say?”
Exactly, give me the summary.
lol, no. Do your own work like the rest of us did. No one said it was fun, but if you want to effectively debate some written work, you need to familiarize yourself with the material. Anything less is just laziness, frankly. What do you think this; Sparknotes.com?
Quote:There are atheists like me who oppose institutionalized religion, and then some atheists who also spend their time studying the Bible to understand what makes it wrong.
Regardless, I find it a waste of time.
Then you shouldn’t be debating the Bible. You have no business debating any original source material if you haven’t read the source material yourself. That’s just called being an honest and diligent interlocutor. Why would you think you could win a debate over a book you’ve never read?
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
