RE: Literal and Not Literal
September 5, 2019 at 10:36 am
(This post was last modified: September 5, 2019 at 10:59 am by Anomalocaris.)
Your loquacious bullshit is nothing more than effete justification of avoidance by the complacently idle.
How many people trouble themselves with meaning when survival is convincingly imperiled but can still plausibly be fought for and maintained? The dominant priority becomes clear when only one of the two two can sought. People are largely distinguish not by their first priority, but by their relative indolence or enterprise in meeting it when it appears there could still be slack or that others would bear the burden.
Other than creating a behavioral framework, Meaning fundamentally has no real meaning whatsoever. At basic level of reality effecting humans the search for meaning is the idle indulgence in a set of tertiary urges ultimately implanted by the quirk of the genetics of neurological circuitry whose dominant shaping factor had always been adaptation to the need for survival.
How many people trouble themselves with meaning when survival is convincingly imperiled but can still plausibly be fought for and maintained? The dominant priority becomes clear when only one of the two two can sought. People are largely distinguish not by their first priority, but by their relative indolence or enterprise in meeting it when it appears there could still be slack or that others would bear the burden.
Other than creating a behavioral framework, Meaning fundamentally has no real meaning whatsoever. At basic level of reality effecting humans the search for meaning is the idle indulgence in a set of tertiary urges ultimately implanted by the quirk of the genetics of neurological circuitry whose dominant shaping factor had always been adaptation to the need for survival.
