RE: Literal and Not Literal
September 9, 2019 at 3:36 pm
(This post was last modified: September 9, 2019 at 3:39 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Sure, scientists can be unscientific. They’re human beings.
We were discussing whether evolutionary biology was unscientific. Or different, even, from what parts of biology you do accept.
Is a hypothesis, both consistent with theory and consistent with observations....but unverifiable due to lack of a time machine....
......unscientific....?
In what way, specifically? Additionally, how does that tie in with literal and non literal interpretations in your beliefs?
We were discussing whether evolutionary biology was unscientific. Or different, even, from what parts of biology you do accept.
Is a hypothesis, both consistent with theory and consistent with observations....but unverifiable due to lack of a time machine....
......unscientific....?
In what way, specifically? Additionally, how does that tie in with literal and non literal interpretations in your beliefs?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
