RE: Literal and Not Literal
September 10, 2019 at 9:43 am
(This post was last modified: September 10, 2019 at 9:43 am by John 6IX Breezy.)
(September 10, 2019 at 9:33 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: Semantic equivocation. That isn’t -all- the possible relationships between them. The theory has excluded all but three, in your retelling.
If we replace the cats with letters A B and C we get the following combinations:
AB - C
A - BC
AC - B
I personally don't see any other possible combinations for that phylogeny, but if there is one the theory has not excluded it. Perhaps in the future someone else will forward that hypothesis as well (maybe they already have and I simply haven't come across it).