RE: My Video about Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
September 22, 2019 at 1:33 pm
(This post was last modified: September 22, 2019 at 1:59 pm by Athene.)
Well, I did watch the video--in it's entirety.
You're welcome, btw!
A little smarmy, IMO, but you did manage touch on the ignorant, uninformed anti-nuclear stance of some Dems without coming off as a climate denier...Up until the end, at least.
I can see how one might side-eye the info at the end where you spoke of the scientists who have theorized that the melting of glacier ice would eventually stall/stabilize atmospheric warming--and then casually glossed over the major chemistry changes to world's oceans and rising sea levels that would occur place before that might happen as if that would be no big deal. It came off as a little evasive and cringey, to be honest.
You would have done better to leave it at making the case for nuclear energy as clean energy when implemented wisely, and perhaps informing the audience as to it's potential as an extremely efficient (though not renewable) energy source that could drastically reduce dependency on imported fuel by rambling on about improving upon breeder/fast breeder reactors or something like that instead.
As an unaffiliated voter and ordinary citizen who is not a scientist (or former bartender), I would give the a vid a C- I guess.
Don't know what the equivalent of a C- is in Croatia. Sorry.
Here is the U.S., it means you most definitely dropped the ball to a degree, but still produced passable work.
Barely.
You're welcome, btw!
A little smarmy, IMO, but you did manage touch on the ignorant, uninformed anti-nuclear stance of some Dems without coming off as a climate denier...Up until the end, at least.
I can see how one might side-eye the info at the end where you spoke of the scientists who have theorized that the melting of glacier ice would eventually stall/stabilize atmospheric warming--and then casually glossed over the major chemistry changes to world's oceans and rising sea levels that would occur place before that might happen as if that would be no big deal. It came off as a little evasive and cringey, to be honest.
You would have done better to leave it at making the case for nuclear energy as clean energy when implemented wisely, and perhaps informing the audience as to it's potential as an extremely efficient (though not renewable) energy source that could drastically reduce dependency on imported fuel by rambling on about improving upon breeder/fast breeder reactors or something like that instead.
As an unaffiliated voter and ordinary citizen who is not a scientist (or former bartender), I would give the a vid a C- I guess.
Don't know what the equivalent of a C- is in Croatia. Sorry.
Here is the U.S., it means you most definitely dropped the ball to a degree, but still produced passable work.
Barely.
