(November 13, 2019 at 7:07 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(November 13, 2019 at 7:04 pm)Grandizer Wrote: Predermines to be actual. Not the same thing as predetermining what choices you make.
To be clear, the argument is making use of possible worlds semantics.
Which is precisely the same as actualizing the 'choices' themselves.
Boru
Yeah, you're restricted to only one choice in the actual world. But if in other possible worlds you chose something that wasn't made in the actual world, then the choice not being actualized does not mean you weren't free to make it, because you do make it in other possible worlds.
Now is that really free will? No, I have strong doubts that it is. But if we're defining free will in the traditional sense: that I could have done not-X instead of X given the same conditions, then whether that's possible and could really be deemed as free will, as long as we're going with this definition, then it seems like such free will can be compatible with omniscience.
