Jesus' Mission....

[Abaddon_ire]

The second sentence does not follow from the first.

---

This might help:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_fallacy

If you cant explain how without referring me to wikipedia, ill take that as you conceding.

The citation of Wiki, is not a concession, but the deployment of the modal fallacy most definitely is.

What, in effect, Grandiser is claiming is that although some being has already "actualised" your choice of x, you do not necessarily have to make the choice of x.

This is self contradictory on it's face and can be dismissed.

ETA: Or alternatively, said being has evidently not "actualised" anything at all, since you still have the option to choose NOT x.

OR, "actualising" anything means something else to Grandiser.