Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 18, 2025, 12:01 pm
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Dual core, Quad core??

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Dual core, Quad core??
Rob Offline
Junior Member
**
Religious Views: Jenova's Witness - Church of the One Winged Angel
Posts: 337
Threads: 14
Joined: September 12, 2008
Reputation: 8
#39
RE: Dual core, Quad core??
June 5, 2009 at 3:15 pm (This post was last modified: June 5, 2009 at 3:24 pm by Rob.)
(June 5, 2009 at 2:46 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: You see again, you are talking ancient history because NT (the OS upon which ALL current versions of Windows are based) WAS built for networking and I believe that even OS2 (which preceded NT) was built for networking. Why do you guys do that? It's like me saying *nix was never designed for a GUI (and it wasn't in it's earliest incarnations).

Kyu

Well in one instance i see no evidence that it has changed and in the other i see adaptation. I'm not talking ancient history, the flawed foundation is clearly still there. If it wasn't, the likes of viruses wouldn't be as rampant as they are now.
Hoi Zaeme.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Dual core, Quad core??

Messages In This Thread
Dual core, Quad core?? - by Darwinian - May 6, 2009 at 3:35 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - May 6, 2009 at 3:48 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Darwinian - May 6, 2009 at 3:55 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - May 6, 2009 at 4:51 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - May 6, 2009 at 5:45 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - May 6, 2009 at 5:53 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - May 6, 2009 at 6:03 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by padraic - May 6, 2009 at 8:18 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - May 7, 2009 at 12:58 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by padraic - May 7, 2009 at 2:43 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 3, 2009 at 4:56 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 1:34 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 3, 2009 at 2:20 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - June 3, 2009 at 2:04 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 2:08 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 2:25 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 3, 2009 at 2:33 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 2:41 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 4, 2009 at 3:46 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 4:00 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 7:32 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 2:38 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 11:32 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 11:46 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 7:17 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 3:25 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 3:59 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 4:15 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 4:29 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 5:05 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 4, 2009 at 7:35 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 8:13 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 8:38 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 4, 2009 at 8:51 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 9:34 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 5, 2009 at 1:02 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 5, 2009 at 8:44 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 5, 2009 at 2:46 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 5, 2009 at 3:15 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - June 5, 2009 at 3:16 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 5, 2009 at 4:23 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 5, 2009 at 4:21 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 5, 2009 at 5:02 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 5, 2009 at 8:47 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 5, 2009 at 6:43 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 3:25 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 5, 2009 at 9:18 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 5, 2009 at 11:35 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2009 at 12:35 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:04 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 8:08 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:10 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 8:12 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:22 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 9:05 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 6, 2009 at 9:02 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 7, 2009 at 7:35 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:17 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 7, 2009 at 3:46 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - June 7, 2009 at 4:30 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 7, 2009 at 4:35 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)