Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 16, 2025, 11:41 am
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Dual core, Quad core??

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Dual core, Quad core??
leo-rcc Offline
Support Intelligent falling!
*****
Religious Views: Pastafarian
Posts: 4807
Threads: 291
Joined: October 29, 2008
Reputation: 35
#40
RE: Dual core, Quad core??
June 5, 2009 at 3:16 pm
OS/2 was supposed to be the next DOS, a protected mode DOS (It was supposed to be called CP/DOS).

OS/2 1.0 had no network support at all, 1.1 which IBM didn't sell outside its own client base had SNA support for connecting to IBM Mainframes. OS/2 1.2 was the first to have a networking engine supporting TCP/IP and IPX/SPX.

The first OS/2 that the general audience could buy with network support was OS/2 2.0 after the break-up with Microsoft.

NT 3.1 inherited the OS/2 1.2 LAN Manager networking engine, coupled with the improved BSD TCP/IP Unix stack.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Pastafarian
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Dual core, Quad core??

Messages In This Thread
Dual core, Quad core?? - by Darwinian - May 6, 2009 at 3:35 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - May 6, 2009 at 3:48 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Darwinian - May 6, 2009 at 3:55 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - May 6, 2009 at 4:51 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - May 6, 2009 at 5:45 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - May 6, 2009 at 5:53 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - May 6, 2009 at 6:03 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by padraic - May 6, 2009 at 8:18 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - May 7, 2009 at 12:58 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by padraic - May 7, 2009 at 2:43 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 3, 2009 at 4:56 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 1:34 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 3, 2009 at 2:20 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - June 3, 2009 at 2:04 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 2:08 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 2:25 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 3, 2009 at 2:33 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 2:41 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 4, 2009 at 3:46 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 4:00 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 7:32 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 2:38 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 11:32 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 11:46 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 7:17 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 3:25 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 3:59 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 4:15 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 4:29 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 5:05 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 4, 2009 at 7:35 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 8:13 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 8:38 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 4, 2009 at 8:51 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 9:34 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 5, 2009 at 1:02 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 5, 2009 at 8:44 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 5, 2009 at 2:46 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 5, 2009 at 3:15 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - June 5, 2009 at 3:16 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 5, 2009 at 4:23 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 5, 2009 at 4:21 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 5, 2009 at 5:02 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 5, 2009 at 8:47 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 5, 2009 at 6:43 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 3:25 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 5, 2009 at 9:18 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 5, 2009 at 11:35 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2009 at 12:35 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:04 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 8:08 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:10 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 8:12 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:22 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 9:05 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 6, 2009 at 9:02 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 7, 2009 at 7:35 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:17 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 7, 2009 at 3:46 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - June 7, 2009 at 4:30 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 7, 2009 at 4:35 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)