At work.
Hello Yukon Jack.
Your propposed hypothesis for adressing the current understanding/knowledge of Abiogenesis doesn't actually adress the 'How' or 'Nuts and bolts' of some 'Thing' or 'Being' organizing molecules into RNA and DNA.
It's kind of wanting/usless if you thence should want to go from basic organic chemistry to Hominid.
It does nothing for other, bigger things such as reality precursor.
Nor does it move you any closer to any specific idea about the innitial molecule assembler.
Heck. If you're positing an innitial molecule assembler. You're making any such 'Being' effectively lot smaller than any reality precursor.
Cheers.
Hello Yukon Jack.
Your propposed hypothesis for adressing the current understanding/knowledge of Abiogenesis doesn't actually adress the 'How' or 'Nuts and bolts' of some 'Thing' or 'Being' organizing molecules into RNA and DNA.
It's kind of wanting/usless if you thence should want to go from basic organic chemistry to Hominid.
It does nothing for other, bigger things such as reality precursor.
Nor does it move you any closer to any specific idea about the innitial molecule assembler.
Heck. If you're positing an innitial molecule assembler. You're making any such 'Being' effectively lot smaller than any reality precursor.
Cheers.
