My evidence is taken on the assumption that Christs powers were over-rated and that he was a cult figure, if that. To begin to argue over the divinity of Christ, I would have to re-structure my evidence.
Please could any posts be geared toward arguing for or against Christ existing as a man and largly ignore the miricles as I think it is beside the point of the evidence I have provided.
Please could any posts be geared toward arguing for or against Christ existing as a man and largly ignore the miricles as I think it is beside the point of the evidence I have provided.