RE: The Humanities
December 22, 2019 at 1:25 pm
(This post was last modified: December 22, 2019 at 2:33 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(December 22, 2019 at 12:23 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Quote:Like it or not, in European history it was largely through the framework of religion that people considered questions of value, sympathy, and the good life. Any standard other than monetary was usually given a Christian setting, and any push-back against the selfishness of the rich was usually framed in Christian terms. This doesn't mean it was consistent at all -- Christianity has been used to justify the rich as well as the poor. But Christianity supplied the vocabulary and the tools to consider these issues.
I think that, if religion (full stop) is given kudos for supplying 'the vocabulary and tools to consider these issues', there's a fair case to be made.
But singling out Christianity only works once Christianity became the (or at least 'a') dominant force in a society. To use Europe (per your example), prior to the advent of Christianity people were still able to consider questions of value, sympathy and the good life. But they approached it through the framework of other religions (Roman, Greek, Celtic, Norse, etc). Historically, religion has been an extremely powerful cultural force, so it makes sense that the dominant religion would have a large say in cultural development.
But to single out Christianity seems particularly unfair as, for the majority of European history, Christianity was NOT a dominant cultural force.
Boru
Yes, but not singling put Christianity would defeat the entire purpose of his being here while pretending assiduously not to be a Christian.
By being “Christian”, I don’t mean one who necessarily buys the crap about messiah, trinity, salvation, or that bullshit as being literally true. If we use that standard, there would be precious few christians amongst the Christians. I would venture very few of those Christians who were most responsible over the last 2000 years for casting the baleful shadow of Christianity so thoroughly over the west has been would have qualified as being Christians.
By being Christian I mean one who feels the crap about messiah or trinity should continue to exerted it’s baleful shadow, regardless of whether it is true or not, because so misanthropic are they that they would think humanity deserve nothing better, are so worthless and misbegotten that collectively they can not make a go of anything better than the vile Christianity shit, and so wretched that they collectively should hold “Christians” as these in reverence.