RE: The code that is DNA
December 29, 2019 at 8:02 pm
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2019 at 8:03 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
(December 29, 2019 at 7:54 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: OFC. It's painfully obvious that our cretins believe that it was magic - but it's important to understand what it is we're saying when we assert things like "abiogenesis aint possible". Particularly when we're using that imagined impossibility in order to propose that it can only be possible..by magic.But he will pull his fallacious statics argument say Tour backs him and call it a day (despite the fact Tours dishonesty is well known and that statistic doesn't seem to discourage the dozens of people just as qualified as Tour from voicing confidence in abiogenesis )
Either life can come from non life, or it can't. Sure, sane people think that the same life enabling organic chemistry at play today was operative then - but a fairy and his magic spell is another candidate in the non life category. 50/50
Quote:Now what? Phylogenies are still hypotheses. Species are still poorly defined. Biologists still distinguish microevolution from macroevolution. None of what I've said was affected by my sudden disbelief in creator monkeys.All positions you insist on that have already been refuted
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM