(December 29, 2019 at 9:46 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:You know his response will be a small novel of word salad(December 29, 2019 at 7:53 pm)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: I'm not your debate partner. I'm studying these topics on my own, and engaging in conversation to help with retention. If I believed monkeys created the universe, for example, there is no burden of proof until I make use of that information. I'm bored at this point, lets fast forward. I'll claim monkeys created the universe to make you happy. You'll say the burden of proof is on me bla bla where's the mechanism of action bla bla. Oh no, I have no proof. Oh no, I'm getting hammered by a forum full of atheists. Oh no, I can no longer believe monkeys created the universe [insert sad deconversion experience followed by a renewed purpose and identity].
Now what? Phylogenies are still hypotheses. Species are still poorly defined. Biologists still distinguish microevolution from macroevolution. None of what I've said was affected by my sudden disbelief in creator monkeys.
Do you believe god created life on earth, John?
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
